Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 820M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 820M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 28.83GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 820M
0.622 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +380%
2.989 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 800M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
901 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.83GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.480 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
25.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
25.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
5 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy