Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 840A vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce 840A vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 840A and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 840A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 88% (2115MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 16.02GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 840A
0.863 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +1405%
12.99 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 800A
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1635 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
1001 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.02GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
3072
16
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

33W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy