Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 840A vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

NVIDIA GeForce 840A vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 840A and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 840A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 95W)
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1266MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 16.02GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 840A
0.863 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM +576%
5.834 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Sep 2016
GeForce 800A
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
1001 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.02GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

33W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy