Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8600M GS and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8600M GS
0.029 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +30727%
8.94 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 8M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
24
16
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
28.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
AD107
G86-770-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy