Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 384MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 384GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
3488 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GS
0.264 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V320 +3971%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
852 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

384MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
192bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
3584
48
TMUs
224
12
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
26.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
264.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
230W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Vega 10
G92-150-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy