Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs ATI FireGL V8650

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650 +92%
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 8
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
792 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
320bit
Memory Bus
512bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
16
20
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

143W
TDP
Unknown
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
R600
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy