Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs ATI FirePro V4800

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs ATI FirePro V4800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.36GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 320GB)
304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (69W vs 143W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800 +171%
0.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 8
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
792 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
400
24
TMUs
20
20
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
-
-
-
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

143W
TDP
69W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
Redwood
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy