Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
More VRAM (320GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.36GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Feb 2007
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
792 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
4
20
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
80 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

143W
TDP
Unknown
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
RV530
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
RV530 X1650 (215CCCBKB12FG)
Tesla
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy