CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA PG506 242
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA PG506 242
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
NVIDIA PG506 242
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3472 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
PG506 242
+3736%
10.32 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
VS
PG506 242
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 8
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
640MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
320bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
112
Shading Units
3584
28
TMUs
224
20
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
80 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GA100
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
165W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
3
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
4
AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
6
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
7
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
8
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
9
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs AMD Radeon HD 6570
10
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy