Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 920A vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

NVIDIA GeForce 920A vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 920A and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock937MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (56.06GB/s vs 16.02GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 33W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 920A
0.733 TFLOPS
GeForce MX350 +63%
1.199 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Feb 2020
GeForce 900A
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
747 MHz
-
Boost Clock
937 MHz
1001 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.02GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
384
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.99 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.98 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.74 GFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1199 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.48 GFLOPS

Board Design

33W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK208B
GPU Name
GP107
N16V-GM
GPU Variant
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy