Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 920A vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5725

NVIDIA GeForce 920A vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5725

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 920A and 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5725 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 920A 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
264 additional rendering cores
ATI Mobility FireGL V5725 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 16.02GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 920A +349%
0.733 TFLOPS
Mobility FireGL V5725
0.163 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 900A
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1001 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.02GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
120
32
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.720 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.440 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.2 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

33W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK208B
GPU Name
M86
N16V-GM
GPU Variant
M86-ME XT GL (216-0683010)
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
0.378 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
135 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy