Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9300M G and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
3056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9300M G
0.026 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +47400%
12.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 9M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
24
16
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

13W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
AD107
NB9M-GS1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy