Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9500 GS and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 16.13GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9500 GS
0.088 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +13536%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 9
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
504 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.13GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
22
32
Shading Units
2816
16
TMUs
88
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
88.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
AD107
G96-259-A1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy