Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 9650M GS and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 35W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1605MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2528 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9650M GS
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q +10172%
8.218 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2008
Release Date
Jan 2023
GeForce 9M
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1605 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
20
32
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.04 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.218 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.218 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
128.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

29W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
AD107
NB9P-GS1-A2
GPU Variant
GN21-X2
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
Unknown
169 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy