Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs Intel H3C XG310

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
H3C XG310 +892%
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Nov 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
24.00GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
12
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
DG1
G92-159-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
Unknown
260 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy