Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +3313%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Aug 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
24.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
12
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Fiji
G92-159-B1
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy