CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs ATI FirePro V3800
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs ATI FirePro V3800
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
ATI FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.28GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
328 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
+176%
0.52 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
VS
FirePro V3800
Graphics Card
Feb 2010
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 300
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
9
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
5
72
Shading Units
400
24
TMUs
20
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
4.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
12.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
187.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GT215
GPU Name
Redwood
GT215-250-A2
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Board Design
43W
TDP
43W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
2
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
3
ATI Radeon HD 5450 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
4
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 550
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
6
Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
8
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM
9
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition
10
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy