Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6600 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
1696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6600 +3498%
9.247 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Jun 2021
GeForce 300
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
27.20GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
165.1 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
289.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.49 TFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.247 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
577.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Navi 23
GT215-301-A3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy