Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
16848 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +47289%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Jan 2024
GeForce 400
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
333 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
192GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
10.66GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
132
48
Shading Units
16896
16
TMUs
528
8
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
130.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
1000W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GB100
GT216-305-A3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
208 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
9.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy