Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs AMD FirePro W8100

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs AMD FirePro W8100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM and 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 220W)
AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
2512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
FirePro W8100 +3120%
4.219 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Jun 2014
GeForce 400
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
333 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
10.66GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.74 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
130.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.219 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.109 TFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
220W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Hawaii
GT216-305-A3
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL40
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy