Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs NVIDIA PG506 242

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs NVIDIA PG506 242

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
3536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
PG506 242 +7777%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 400
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
333 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
10.66GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
56
48
Shading Units
3584
16
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
130.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
165W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GA100
GT216-305-A3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
8.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy