Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2087MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
3792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800X +12136%
16.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Aug 2021
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2087 MHz
333 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
10.66GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
3840
16
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
200.4 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
500.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.06 TFLOPS
130.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.03 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1002 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
Apple MPX

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Navi 21
GT216-305-A3
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XLA
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy