Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
16848 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 520
0.156 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +39694%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2024
GeForce 500
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
192GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
132
48
Shading Units
16896
8
TMUs
528
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.620 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
6.480 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
155.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
12.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

29W
TDP
1000W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
GB100
GF119-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
208 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
9.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy