Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 630 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 580W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 630
0.311 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X2 +1710%
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2012
Release Date
Jun 2014
GeForce 600
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
345.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
2816
16
TMUs
176
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
12.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
311.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
25.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
580W
250 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
4x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
Hawaii
GF108-400-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy