Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 645 OEM and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
72 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (102W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 91.87GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 645 OEM +66%
0.894 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2012
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
957 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
448bit
91.87GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
27
288
Shading Units
216
48
TMUs
72
24
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
384 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.312 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
37.25 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
894.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
74.50 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

102W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF114
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy