Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 720 OEM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 720 OEM
0.381 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +647%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
Jul 2020
GeForce 700
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
192
Shading Units
896
16
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.972 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
15.89 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
381.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
15.89 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy