Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD Radeon E8950

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD Radeon E8950

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M and 8GB VRAM Radeon E8950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 95W)
AMD Radeon E8950 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
Radeon E8950 +2033%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Sep 2015
GeForce 100M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
256.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
Amethyst
N10E-GS1
GPU Variant
E8950
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
5 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy