Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1250MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300M +1566%
3.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Nov 2019
GeForce 100M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.00 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.400 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.200 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
85W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
Navi 14
N10E-GS1
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PROA
Tesla
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy