Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 vs ATI FirePro V8750

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 vs ATI FirePro V8750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (106W vs 151W)
ATI FirePro V8750 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450
0.601 TFLOPS
FirePro V8750 +99%
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Jul 2008
GeForce 400
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
902 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
800
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.264 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
25.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
601.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
50.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

106W
TDP
151W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
RV770
GF106-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
Fermi
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy