Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450
0.601 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265 +215%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Feb 2014
GeForce 400
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
902 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.264 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
25.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
601.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
50.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

106W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GF106-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy