Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD FirePro D500

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD FirePro D500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +98%
4.416 TFLOPS
FirePro D500
2.227 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Jan 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
243.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
24
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
1536
80
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.60 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.227 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
556.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
274W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Tahiti
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti LE GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy