CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 384MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
1184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (84W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+1572%
4.416 TFLOPS
GeForce 9600 GSO
0.264 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
VS
GeForce 9600 GSO
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Apr 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
384MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
96
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
12
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.40 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
264.0 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
G92
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Board Design
100W
TDP
84W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA T400
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs ATI Radeon HD 4450
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy