Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro W6500M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro W6500M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro W6500M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (2040MHz vs 1485MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
3.041 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6500M +37%
4.178 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz
Base Clock
1512 MHz
1485 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

47.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
95.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
130.6 GTexel/s
6.083 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.356 TFLOPS
3.041 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.178 TFLOPS
95.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
261.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Navi 24
N18P-G61
GPU Variant
Navi 24
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy