Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI FirePro V7800

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI FirePro V7800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7800 's Advantages
544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +41%
2.849 TFLOPS
FirePro V7800
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
18
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1440
56
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Cypress
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy