Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
848 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +2010%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 520 OEM
0.135 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
2
896
Shading Units
48
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
134.6 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.22 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
29W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
GF119
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GF119 B1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy