Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 134.4GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +164%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
1.078 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
16
896
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.86 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.73 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1078 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
GF100
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy