Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (1590MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +35%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
2.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
1033 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
960
56
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.96 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.84 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.108 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
GK106
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy