NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel Arc A780
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (2200MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
Arc A780
+503%
18.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
2200 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.253 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
DG2-512
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
