Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FirePro W8100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FirePro W8100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 220W)
AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
FirePro W8100 +41%
4.219 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Jun 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
2560
56
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.74 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.8 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.219 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.109 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
220W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Hawaii
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL40
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy