NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages

Lower TDP (75W vs 1000W)

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 9 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1837MHz vs 1665MHz)

More VRAM (96GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)

16000 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1650

2.984 TFLOPS

B200 SXM 192 GB +1980%

62.08 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650

VS

B200 SXM 192 GB

Graphics Card

Apr 2019

Release Date

Jan 2024

GeForce 16

Generation

Tesla Blackwell

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz

Base Clock

1665 MHz

Boost Clock

1837 MHz

2001 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

96GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

HBM3e

128bit

Memory Bus

4096bit

128.1GB/s

Bandwidth

4100GB/s

Render Config

14

SM Count

132

-

Compute Units

-

896

Shading Units

16896

56

TMUs

528

32

ROPs

24

-

Tensor Cores

528

-

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

256 KB (per SM)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

50 MB

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

44.09 GPixel/s

93.24 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

969.9 GTexel/s

5.967 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

248.3 TFLOPS

2.984 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

62.08 TFLOPS

93.24 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

31.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117

GPU Name

GB100

TU117-300-A1

GPU Variant

-

Turing

Architecture

Blackwell

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

5 nm

4.7 billion

Transistors

208 billion

200 mm²

Die Size

Unknown

Board Design

75W

TDP

1000W

250 W

Suggested PSU

1400 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

No outputs

None

Power Connectors

-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

N/A

4.6

OpenGL

N/A

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

N/A

7.5

CUDA

9.0

6.6

Shader Model

N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA T400

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM PCI

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FireStream 9370

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2

Related News

1

The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation

2

Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits

3

Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU

4

Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4

5

AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds

6

Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory

7

AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2

8

AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future

9

Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs

10

TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion