Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA CMP 70HX

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA CMP 70HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 8GB VRAM CMP 70HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1665MHz vs 1395MHz)
NVIDIA CMP 70HX 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (608.3GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
CMP 70HX +258%
10.71 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Jan 2021
GeForce 16
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
1365 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1188 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
608.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
30
896
Shading Units
3840
56
TMUs
120
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
30
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
167.4 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.71 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.71 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
167.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GA104
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
GA104-100-A1
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy