Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FirePro V5900

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 +385%
2.984 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Cayman
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy