Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
RV380
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
130 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy