Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX 6300

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX 6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (2040MHz vs 1665MHz)
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6300 +4%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
32bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x HDMI 2.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Navi 24
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy