Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD FirePro W4100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD FirePro W4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER +679%
5.027 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2019
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
512
88
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Cape Verde
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy