Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti +227%
5.437 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2019
Release Date
Jul 2019
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
640
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

84.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
169.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
10.87 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
5.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
169.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
65W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Polaris 23
TU116-400-A1
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy