CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1296 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660
+1768%
5.027 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660
VS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
Graphics Card
Mar 2019
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
640MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
320bit
192.1GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
22
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
1408
Shading Units
112
88
TMUs
28
48
ROPs
20
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
G80
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Board Design
120W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GP104
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon RX 580
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs ATI Radeon HD 5570
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy