Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (1785MHz vs 1000MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (120W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 192.1GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 +22%
5.027 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2019
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
950 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.1GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
2048
88
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
375W
300 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Tahiti
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy