CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
88 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand 's Advantages
Lower TDP (125W vs 171W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
+19%
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
0.448 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jul 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
27
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
216
Shading Units
128
72
TMUs
64
28
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.60 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
448.0 GFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
G92
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
G92-270-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Board Design
171W
TDP
125W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
2
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2
4
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 5830
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6800
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy