Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (69W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 +108%
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Nov 2009
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
54.40GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
216
Shading Units
96
72
TMUs
32
28
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GT215
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
69W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy